<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Git Workflow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solutions.treypiepmeier.com/2009/07/17/my-git-workflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solutions.treypiepmeier.com/2009/07/17/my-git-workflow/</link>
	<description>So I don&#039;t have to figure things out more than once.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 23:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://solutions.treypiepmeier.com/2009/07/17/my-git-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-52921</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 02:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solutions.treypiepmeier.com/?p=295#comment-52921</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If I were doing some significantly different things within that branch, I wouldn&#039;t keep it all in one commit.  I only amend if it&#039;s taking me a while for one coherent commit.  I do it while building something, and when it&#039;s at a stopping point, I merge it back in to the rest of the codebase or continue with more commits on the same branch.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It keeps me from having really tiny commits.  I mean it when I say I&#039;m an obsessive committer.  I do it only slightly less often than I save the file.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were doing some significantly different things within that branch, I wouldn&#8217;t keep it all in one commit.  I only amend if it&#8217;s taking me a while for one coherent commit.  I do it while building something, and when it&#8217;s at a stopping point, I merge it back in to the rest of the codebase or continue with more commits on the same branch.</p>

<p>It keeps me from having really tiny commits.  I mean it when I say I&#8217;m an obsessive committer.  I do it only slightly less often than I save the file.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://solutions.treypiepmeier.com/2009/07/17/my-git-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-52919</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solutions.treypiepmeier.com/?p=295#comment-52919</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good info. But doesn&#039;t the amending keep you from being able to revert/compare to older versions of files within your feature branch? Isn&#039;t that the whole reason for frequent commits?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good info. But doesn&#8217;t the amending keep you from being able to revert/compare to older versions of files within your feature branch? Isn&#8217;t that the whole reason for frequent commits?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
